| Read 4 Reviews | Add a Review | Login to add comments.  Cred: 1708 | Review by climbhigher
 Good Features If you are looking for a beauty 1:1 shifting ratio that is clean and efficient look no further. It shifts perfect in all conditions from very cold muddy rainy days to dry hot conditions and no problems in between. The weight of this derailleur is kept down to a minimum with the use of materials such as carbon, magnesium and titanium. Bad Features Haven’t been on it that long but have heard of some issues of durability down the line. Time will have to tell on that one. Recommended Alternatives Well I have to say only three letters for something comparable XTR. |
Was this useful? Yes | No Read 4 Reviews | Add a Review | Read 2 Retailer DescriptionsFrom Jenson USA:Just when you thought it couldn't be better, SRAM steps it up with the '06 release of their proven X.0 rear derailleur. This is SRAM's lightest, smoothest, and most advanced design. - Handles 8 or 9 speed drivetrains
- 210g (long cage), 197g (mid cage), and 192g (short cage)
- Works with SRAM ESP 1:1 ratio shifters only (X.0, X.9, X.7, and other 'ESP' units)
- Forged alloy links and B-knuckle, heat-treated pivot pins
- Weight-saving carbon cage on short/mid cages, CNC machined alloy on long cage model
- Sealed cartridge bearing pulleys for durability
Was this useful? Yes | No |
Add ReviewAverage Review: 5 Cred: 1708 | Review by climbhigher
 Good Features If you are looking for a beauty 1:1 shifting ratio that is clean and efficient look no further. It shifts perfect in all conditions from very cold muddy rainy days to dry hot conditions and no problems in between. The weight of this derailleur is kept down to a minimum with the use of materials such as carbon, magnesium and titanium. Bad Features Haven’t been on it that long but have heard of some issues of durability down the line. Time will have to tell on that one. Recommended Alternatives Well I have to say only three letters for something comparable XTR. | Login to add comments. Was this useful? Yes | No  Cred: 5 | Review by mteez
 Good Features This XO rear derailleur just works great. I have had no shifting issues since installation and have not needed to re-adjust it either. The derailleur functions very crisp and precise as you should expect from top of the line equipment and does so without complaint or hesitation regardless of terrain. Bad Features None so far Recommended Alternatives Not shimano XTR. I just got rid of my new XTR for XO and the difference is night and day. This stuff really works and my new XTR never did. So I would recommend another SRAM component over anything out there. The Shimano XTR derailleur was horrible..the worst component I have ever had on any bike ever. If you are wondering which way to go SRAM XO does it best | Login to add comments. Was this useful? Yes | No Login to add comments. Was this useful? Yes | No Login to add comments. Was this useful? Yes | No From Jenson USA:Just when you thought it couldn't be better, SRAM steps it up with the '06 release of their proven X.0 rear derailleur. This is SRAM's lightest, smoothest, and most advanced design. - Handles 8 or 9 speed drivetrains
- 210g (long cage), 197g (mid cage), and 192g (short cage)
- Works with SRAM ESP 1:1 ratio shifters only (X.0, X.9, X.7, and other 'ESP' units)
- Forged alloy links and B-knuckle, heat-treated pivot pins
- Weight-saving carbon cage on short/mid cages, CNC machined alloy on long cage model
- Sealed cartridge bearing pulleys for durability
Was this useful? Yes | No From Price Point:SRAM X.0 is setting the benchmark: Mountain Bike shifting at a Formula 1 level. Never before has a shifting system been faster, lighter and this precise. The available Trigger and Twist shifter offer a choice for any competitive, or performance loving cyclist. SRAM X.0 - the fastest option for shifting! Sram ESP X.0 Rear Derailleur 2008 is a beautiful yet functional piece of art created from carbon, titanium and alloy. Available cage length options and a weight of less than 200 grams make the X.0 rear derailleur the number one choice. Was this useful? Yes | No |